This leaflet was published by several states in the south of the United States as part of a coordinated youth crime initiative that used forced feminisation as a disciplinary tactic. However, it remains unclear whether this leaflet was ever used for it's nominal purpose - to inform at-risk males of the decision to impose a surgical intervention. In fact, many sources claim this leaflet was published purely as propaganda, intended to scare young males into better behaviour in the early phases of their feminisation.
What a gorgeous made-woman. I love the thick red hair and beautiful skin and figure.
ReplyDeleteThe storylette is great. I really enjoyed the pinpointing of the truth underlying the listener's ruse of resistance. It certainly is a scary prospect, but the experience so far far is overwhelmingly compelling - even if it does fly in the face of male ego.
-Clare
She is gorgeous, isn't she?
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you liked the story - the text is undoubtedly cruel, if not downright sadistic - but I was trying to get that sense of having all your psychological defenses torn down and being forced to face up to your situation and yourself. It seems to have worked :)
Wow... the people responsible for this must have taken Boko Haram's credo to their heart. Education is forbidden.
ReplyDeleteInstead of trying to fix the socio-economic and cultural problems that result in a high youth criminality they went with a feminisation campaign. Not only does this shit traumatise the shit out of the kids and has terrible implications for their long term existance as a democratic citizen (abuse by the state tends to disengage people from their society), they have to drive it home by mocking their victims.
It's probably also useless and ineffective. What can they actually do that's worse than this shit?
Congratulation dear politicians responsible for this. You've just created a person who's nothing to fear, nothing to lose, a huge grudge against state and society and the need to aquire ressources for a sex change operation. Congratulation for raising your crime rate.
But I guess that's not an undesirable result for hard on crime types. The more crime there is the more voters they get for their hard on crime stance which creates more criminals... a stable feedback loop until people actually realise this/ less ruthless politicians come into power on a nother platform.
You're right - the whole practice of FF as state punishment is unlikely to be effective, even if you ignore the massive ethical issues involved. However, I suspect that you're hit the nail on the head about why something like this would be a great policy - it makes the politician look tough on crime while actually increasing crime, appeals to the politics of fear, revenge, and cruelty, and transfers a massive chunk of public funds into the hands of a security/medical company, who were probably big donors to the politician's campaign. Big wins all round - except for society, of course, but then, as we all know, there's no such thing as society...
ReplyDelete